<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Do You Think Is The Best Content Management System?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.webseo5.com/cms/what-do-you-think-is-the-best-content-management-system.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.webseo5.com/cms/what-do-you-think-is-the-best-content-management-system.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 06:01:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hilary</title>
		<link>http://www.webseo5.com/cms/what-do-you-think-is-the-best-content-management-system.html/comment-page-1#comment-2289</link>
		<dc:creator>Hilary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 03:50:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webseo5.com/cms/what-do-you-think-is-the-best-content-management-system.html#comment-2289</guid>
		<description>Joomla and Mambo are good I hear</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joomla and Mambo are good I hear</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: freakych</title>
		<link>http://www.webseo5.com/cms/what-do-you-think-is-the-best-content-management-system.html/comment-page-1#comment-2288</link>
		<dc:creator>freakych</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 03:09:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webseo5.com/cms/what-do-you-think-is-the-best-content-management-system.html#comment-2288</guid>
		<description>For me it definitely is Joomla! [The Developers of Joomla! developed Mambo but left and started Joomla! to maintain &#039;open source&#039;] But it depends of course what sort of content you want. Here is a website that you can use to compare features:http://www.cmsmatrix.org/
Try comparing for example Drupal, Mambo and Joomla! and PHP Nuke</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For me it definitely is Joomla! [The Developers of Joomla! developed Mambo but left and started Joomla! to maintain 'open source'] But it depends of course what sort of content you want. Here is a website that you can use to compare features:<a href="http://www.cmsmatrix.org/" rel="nofollow">http://www.cmsmatrix.org/</a><br />
Try comparing for example Drupal, Mambo and Joomla! and PHP Nuke</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

